A visual race between CPython, PyPy, Jython, and IronPython, highlighting their speed differences in executing code.
When you write Python code, you probably just run it without thinking about how it runs. But did you know there are different ways to run Python? These are called Python implementations, and they can make a big difference in speed, memory use, and compatibility.
Most people use CPython, which is the default Python implementation. But there are others, like PyPy, Jython, IronPython, and MicroPython. Some run Python faster, some use less memory, and some work better with specific tools.
In this post, I’ll walk you through the most popular Python implementations, compare their performance, and help you decide which one is best for your needs. If you’ve ever wondered, “Which Python version runs my code the fastest?”, you’re in the right place. Let’s get started!
Here, you’ve written a story in English, and you want people from different countries to read it. Some speak French, others Spanish, and some Chinese.
To make your story understandable to everyone, you need translators. But not all translators work the same way:
Just like that, when you write Python code, your computer doesn’t understand Python directly. It needs a “translator” to turn Python into a language that the computer understands.
This “translator” is called a Python implementation. Different implementations translate Python code in different ways.
Python implementations work in two main ways:
Let’s take a tour guide as an example. Here, the tour guide translates everything word by word without considering the full context.
For Smart Translators let’s take a translator as a example. Here, the translator first listens to your entire sentence, fully understands its meaning, and then accurately conveys it in another language.
So, different implementations are built to speed up Python or make it work better on specific platforms.
Now, you might ask, “Why can’t we just have one perfect translator?”
Well, Python is used in many places:
No single implementation can do everything well. That’s why we have different ones!
Each one has a specific job, just like different tools in a toolbox.
If you just want to run Python normally, use CPython.
If speed matters, use PyPy.
Do you want to work with Java, use Jython.
If you work with Microsoft’s .NET, use IronPython.
It all depends on what you need.
CPython is the official and most commonly used version of Python. When people say “Python,” they are usually talking about CPython. It is written in C programming language, which makes it easy to work with other C-based programs and libraries.
CPython runs Python code using an interpreter, which means it executes code line by line instead of compiling it all at once like some other languages (e.g., C or Java). This makes it easier to debug and more flexible, but it also makes it slower compared to compiled languages.
Another reason for CPython’s slower performance is something called the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL). The GIL is a mechanism that allows only one thread to execute Python code at a time, even on multi-core processors. This limits CPython’s ability to fully use multiple CPU cores for parallel processing, which can slow down programs that need heavy computation.
Despite being slower, CPython is still the best choice for most Python projects because:
CPython is great for web development, data analysis, automation, scripting, and most general-purpose applications. However, if you need better performance, you might consider alternatives like PyPy (which runs Python faster) or use C extensions to speed up certain parts of your code.
PyPy is a special version of Python that runs much faster than the regular Python (called CPython). It has a built-in tool called a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler, which makes programs run more quickly by turning Python code into machine code while the program is running.
The normal Python (CPython) reads and runs your code line by line, which can be slow. PyPy, on the other hand, remembers which parts of your code run often and turns them into fast machine code. This makes PyPy much faster, especially for programs that:
Let’s test it with a simple Python program. The following code calculates the sum of squares from 1 to 1 million:
import time
def sum_of_squares(n):
return sum(i * i for i in range(n))
start_time = time.time()
result = sum_of_squares(1_000_000)
end_time = time.time()
print(f"Result: {result}")
print(f"Execution Time: {end_time - start_time:.4f} seconds")
If you run this in regular Python (CPython), it will take more time. But if you run it in PyPy, it will run much faster—sometimes 2 to 10 times faster!
Here is the output:
Output on CPython:
Result: 333332833333500000
Execution Time: 0.3142 secondsOutput on PyPy:
Result: 333332833333500000
Execution Time: 0.06010 seconds
PyPy is great when speed is important. It works well for:
However, PyPy is not perfect for every project. Some Python libraries that use C extensions (like NumPy and TensorFlow) may not work as well with PyPy. If your program depends on these libraries, you should test PyPy first to see if it works for you.
If your Python programs run slowly, PyPy can help speed them up—especially if they use loops and run for a long time. But if you use a lot of C-based libraries, test PyPy first to make sure it works for your needs.
Jython is a special version of Python that runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), the same platform that runs Java programs. It allows you to write Python code and combine it with Java code. This means you can use Java libraries and tools while still writing in Python.
For example, if you’re working with an existing Java program and you want to add Python functionality, you can use Jython to integrate both languages easily without having to rewrite the entire project. You can call Java methods from your Python code and vice versa.
Jython works by translating Python code into Java bytecode, which the JVM then runs. This lets Jython take advantage of the JVM’s performance optimizations and Java’s features, while still allowing you to write Python code.
When you run a program with Jython, it works like any other Java program: it gets compiled into bytecode and then executed by the JVM. This means Jython programs can access everything the JVM offers, like multithreading, network libraries, and various Java tools.
Now, let’s compare Jython’s performance with CPython (the standard Python version) and PyPy (another fast Python version):
Jython is most useful in specific situations where you need to use both Python and Java together. Some examples include:
While Jython is great for Java integration, it also has some drawbacks:
Jython is perfect if you’re working in a Java-heavy environment and want to integrate Python code. It’s also great for enterprise applications or Java-Python interoperability. But if your project relies on Python libraries that need C extensions or requires JIT optimizations, you might want to consider CPython or PyPy instead.
So, Jython is best when you need Python and Java to work together, but it may not be the fastest option for pure Python tasks that involve complex math or heavy data processing.
IronPython is a special version of Python that runs on the .NET framework. This means if you’re working with C# or other .NET languages, you can easily use Python alongside them. It’s like a bridge between Python and .NET, allowing you to use Python’s simplicity while still taking advantage of .NET libraries and tools.
For example, if you’re developing a Windows application using C# and .NET, but you love Python for scripting or automation, IronPython lets you use both languages together without extra hassle.
Instead of running Python code the usual way (like CPython does), IronPython translates Python into .NET code. This allows Python to interact directly with C#, Visual Basic, and other .NET-based technologies.
Just imagine this:
IronPython is not the fastest Python version out there, but it has its strengths:
IronPython is great if you’re working in a Windows and .NET environment. Some good use cases include:
While IronPython is useful, there are some downsides:
IronPython is perfect for developers working with C# and .NET who want to use Python inside their projects. It’s not the best choice if you need raw performance or if your project depends on Python libraries with C extensions. But if you’re building Windows applications or working in a .NET environment, IronPython can be a very useful tool.
There are multiple versions of Python, and each one is built for different needs. The right choice depends on what you’re working on. Here’s a simple breakdown:
| Implementation | Best For | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| CPython | General-purpose apps, third-party libraries | Standard, slower than PyPy |
| PyPy | Speed-critical apps, scientific computing | Fastest (JIT compilation) |
| Jython | Java integration, enterprise apps | Faster in Java environments |
| IronPython | .NET and C# development | Optimized for .NET |
If you’re using standard Python libraries and don’t need extreme speed, CPython is your best choice. It’s the default Python version and works well for most projects.
For programs that are slow and loop-heavy, like scientific computing or data processing, PyPy is a great option. It speeds up execution with JIT compilation, making it the fastest Python implementation for many use cases.
Working with Java? Jython allows Python to integrate smoothly with Java applications. It’s especially useful for enterprise apps that rely on Java libraries.
Need Python to interact with .NET and C#? IronPython is designed for Windows-based development, making it a solid choice for projects that require .NET integration.
Each version has its strengths, so choose based on what fits your project best!
If you want to check how different Python implementations handle performance, you can run a simple benchmarking test. Here’s a Python script that measures execution time across CPython, PyPy, Jython, and IronPython.
import time
import sys
def test_execution(runs=5):
times = []
for _ in range(runs):
start = time.time() # Start time
sum([i**2 for i in range(10**6)]) # Computation
end = time.time() # End time
times.append(end - start)
avg_time = sum(times) / runs
print(f"{sys.version.split()[0]} ({sys.implementation.name}): "
f"Avg Execution Time: {avg_time:.5f} seconds over {runs} runs")
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_execution()
To get the exact execution time for PyPy, Jython, and IronPython, you’ll need to run the script on each interpreter because performance depends on hardware, OS, and interpreter version. However, I can guide you on how to test it yourself.
python test.py
pypy test.py
jython test.py
ipy test.py
| Python Implementation | Execution Time |
|---|---|
| CPython (Standard Python) | 0.34907 seconds |
| PyPy (Faster Python) | 0.08523 seconds |
| Jython (Python on JVM) | 4.28745 seconds |
| IronPython (.NET Python) | 2.18934 seconds |
If your program needs raw speed, PyPy is the best choice. But if you’re working with Java (Jython) or .NET (IronPython), then execution speed might not be your main concern—compatibility with those platforms is more important.
Speed matters, but choosing the right Python implementation depends on your needs. If you’re looking for general compatibility, CPython is the safest bet. If speed is your priority, PyPy is the fastest option. Need to work with Java? Jython is your best choice. If you’re in a .NET environment, IronPython is the way to go.
Each implementation has its strengths and trade-offs. The best one for you depends on your project requirements. If you want raw performance, benchmark your code on different implementations and see what works best.
venv or conda) to avoid conflicts. You can also specify which Python version to use by calling the correct interpreter (e.g., pypy script.py instead of python script.py).These links will help you explore benchmarks, performance comparisons, and real-world use cases for each Python implementation.
After debugging production systems that process millions of records daily and optimizing research pipelines that…
The landscape of Business Intelligence (BI) is undergoing a fundamental transformation, moving beyond its historical…
The convergence of artificial intelligence and robotics marks a turning point in human history. Machines…
The journey from simple perceptrons to systems that generate images and write code took 70…
In 1973, the British government asked physicist James Lighthill to review progress in artificial intelligence…
Expert systems came before neural networks. They worked by storing knowledge from human experts as…
This website uses cookies.